Without a doubt, Sierpinski's Triangle is at the same time one of the most interesting and one of the simplest fractal shapes in existence. Because one of the neatest things about Sierpinski's triangle is how many different and easy ways there are to generate it, I'll talk

If you came here for Sierpinski images, I cannot be but flattered. You can download any of the following images:

- Transparent Sierpinski Triangle as pictured above (521x451, 7.58KB)
- Geometric Construction Diagram as seen below (525x120, 2.09KB)
- Sierpinski picture showing fractal structure (640x480, 9.46KB)
- IFS generated Sierpinski Triangle (640x480, 10.9KB)

The most conceptually simple way of generating the Sierpinski Triangle is to begin with a (usually, but not necessarily, equilateral) triangle (first figure below). Connect the midpoints of each side to form four separate triangles, and cut out the triangle in the center (second figure). For each of the three remaining triangles, perform this same act (third figure). Iterate infinitely (final figure).

As a total aside, I have found that methodically drawing the Sierpinski triangle during boring lectures greatly relieves stress. If more boring lectures are anticipated, draw a huge one, like one that spans an entire sheet of regular paper drawn to painstaking detail. After a few lectures your boredom will be greatly relieved, your stress will go down, chicks (or hunks, as the case may be) will dig you, and you'll end up with a really, really impressively detailed (andlarge) Sierpinski Triangle which people will be really impressed with. They will say things like "Man, that's cool!" and "Whoa, how'dja do that!" and "Man, you must have beenreallybored."

The concept of the Iterated Function System was invented by creative fractal genius Michael Barnsley. An IFS is composed of a few simple elements: transformations and probabilities. The transformations are usually expressed as matrices--one translational matrix and one transformational matrix. This sounds a bit dry, but actually the concept is a bit more interesting than all that. For the Sierpinski Triangle, the transformations are simple, and are better expressed as rules in a recursive procedure:

That's it! Sierpinski's Triangle. To get any sort of worthwhile picture, of course, hundreds to thousands of points need to be plotted. In fact, usually the first twenty or so points are off track and need not be plotted. However, the algorithm outlined above is amazingly simple to do, and incredibly easy to implement on any machine. I have written Sierpinski programs for every graphing calculator under the sun, as well as for most desktop computers as well. Try it yourself in BASIC or on a graphing calculator. You'll surprise yourself at how easy it is to impress people with a graphing calculator. :)

- Begin by selecting three vertices in the two-dimensional plane. Note their coordinates.
- Next, select an initial point--best if within the bounds of the triangle formed by the three vertices, but this is not a requirement.

The main procedure goes as follows.

- Select one of the three vertices at random. Roll a six sided die and integer-divide by two, flip three coins and take the exception, or ask a friendly computer for help.
- From the current location of the point, calculate the midpoint of the line connecting the point and the vertex just selected.
- Move to this midpoint, and plot the point.
Iteratead infinitum.

Recall Pascal's Triangle, in which the outer edges are filled with ones and each inner element is the sum of its upper adjecent elements. This is a fascinating creature; Pascal's Triangle has always seemed to pop up in the strangest places: number theory, probability theory, even polynomial expansion. Well, it turns up in chaos theory as well. Look at the twelve-row expansion of Sierpinski's Triangle shown below:

Note that the triangle is divided into rectangular grids, with each grid occupied by one integer. Looks pretty innoculous by itself, nothing new, but any familiar to Pascal's Triangle--any math team member, any math puzzle lover--will know that nothing about Pascal's Triangle is innoculous. We are looking in this case, at the patterns of even and odd numbers in Pascal's Triangle. We know that they must be regular; so let us take a look at just

The beginnings of Sierpinski's Triangle, clear as day.

And not only that, but we know that the pattern

And all this from something you never thought you'd see outside of basic Algebra.

Under construction.

Under construction.

For now, just plot y = x AND t or y = x OR t, as t varies.

The Sierpinski Triangle raises all sorts of little questions that relate to topics in chaos theory not covered in the last few pages. For example, the Sierpinski Triangle is a canonical example of a shape known as a

Most simply, a fractal is a geometric construction that is self-similar at different scales. This is rather dry. More clearly, a fractal shape will look almost, or even exactly, the same no matter what size it is viewed at.

This is a pretty unintuitive concept. But let us look at the Sierpinski Triangle. The first step in the geometric construction of the Sierpinski Triangle involved splitting a triangle up into three other triangles. When we look at the finished Sierpinski Triangle, we can zoom in on any of these three sub-triangles, and it will look exactly like the entire Sierpinski Triangle itself. In fact, we can zoom in to any depth we would like, and

This is deep. This is very deep.

What is the significance of fractals? They have numerous implications in mathematics and topography, as well as in computer graphics applications.

Under construction.

## How Long is the Coast?

A long, long time ago, fractal god Benoit Mandelbrot posed a whimsical question: How long is the coastline of Britain? His mathematical colleagues were miffed, to say the least, at such annoying waste of their amazing computation powers on this insignificant minutae. They told him to look it up.

Of course, Mandelbrot had a reason for his peculiar question. Quite an interesting reason. Look up the coastline of Britain yourself, in some encyclopedia. Whatever figure you get, it is wrong. Quite simply, the coastline of Britain is infinite.

You protest that this is impossible. Well, consider this. Consider looking at Britain on a very large-scale map. Draw the simplest two-dimensional shape possible, a triangle, which circumscribes Britain as closely as possible. The perimeter of this shape approximates the perimeter of Britain.

However, this area is of course highly inaccurate. Increasing the amount of vertices of the shape going around the coastline, and the area will become closer. The more vertices there are, the closer the circumscribing line will be able to conform to the dips and the protrusions of Britain's rugged coast.

There is one problem, however. Each time the number of vertices increases, the perimeter increases. Itmustincrease, because of the triangle inequality. Moreover, the number of vertices never reaches a maximum. There is no point at which one can say that a shape defines the coastline of Britain. After all, exactly circumscribing the coast of Britain would entail encircling every rock, every tide pool, everypebblewhich happens to lie on the edge of Britain.

Thus, the coastline of Britain is infinite.

To come: Fractal dimension, more about fractals...